The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2 Instruct

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2 Instruct is 4.3x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Kimi K2 Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Kimi K2 Instruct is roughly 4.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Kimi K2 Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 4.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,000,000
200,000
Released
Aug 2026
Jul 2025
License
Unknown
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Kimi K2 Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2 Instruct costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Kimi K2 Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 8.8x more expensive than Kimi K2 Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Kimi K2 Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

247.0B diff

Kimi K2 Instruct has 247.0B more parameters than GLM-5.3, making it 32.8% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct
1.0Tparameters
753.0B
GLM-5.3
1000.0B
Kimi K2 Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2 Instruct's 200,000 tokens. Kimi K2 Instruct can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Kimi K2 Instruct was released on 2025-07-11.

GLM-5.3 is 13 months newer than Kimi K2 Instruct.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.1yr newer
Kimi K2 Instruct

Jul 11, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. Kimi K2 Instruct is available from Fireworks, Novita.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Kimi K2 Instruct

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.57/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2 Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2 Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2 Instruct.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Kimi K2 Instruct?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and Kimi K2 Instruct is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Kimi K2 Instruct in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Kimi K2 Instruct scores MATH-500: 97.4%, GSM8k: 97.3%, CBNSL: 95.6%, HumanEval: 93.3%, MMLU-Redux: 92.7%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Kimi K2 Instruct?

Kimi K2 Instruct is 2.8x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. Kimi K2 Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2 Instruct?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2 Instruct supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2 Instruct?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.50/M), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2 Instruct?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Kimi K2 Instruct is developed by Moonshot AI.