The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is 2.5x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

  • cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.47 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$2.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144
Released
Aug 2026
Sep 2025
License
Unknown
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 ($0.47/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
Input tokens$0.47
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

247.0B diff

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 has 247.0B more parameters than GLM-5.3, making it 32.8% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
1.0Tparameters
753.0B
GLM-5.3
1000.0B
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2-Thinking-0905's 262,144 tokens. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 was released on 2025-09-05.

GLM-5.3 is 11 months newer than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

11mo newer
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

Sep 5, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.47/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.48/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 97.5%, MMLU-Redux: 94.4%, FRAMES: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 84.6%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is 3.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 costs $0.47/M input and $2.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.47/M), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is developed by Moonshot AI.