GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 24.6x cheaper per token.
Zhipu AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GLM-5.3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is roughly 24.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GLM-5.3
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
- cost matters — it's about 24.6x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
GLM-5.3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks.
GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 28.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) ($0.05/1M tokens).
For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 22.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
GLM-5.3 has 723.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B), making it 2410.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) was released on 2026-08-11.
GLM-5.3 is 0 month newer than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).
Aug 14, 2026
1 weeks ago
3d newerAug 11, 2026
2 weeks ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.
GLM-5.3
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).
Related comparisons
More GLM-5.3 comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs Grok 4.6
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs LFM2.5-VL-3B