The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Sakana Namazu

Comparing GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazu across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Zhipu AI · Sakana AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazu trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Sakana Namazu is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Sakana Namazu

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.95 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$4.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
256,000
Released
Aug 2026
Aug 2026
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazudon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Sakana Namazu costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Sakana Namazu ($0.95/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Sakana Namazu ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Sakana Namazu.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerNovita
Sakana AI
Sakana Namazu
Input tokens$0.95
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Sakana Namazu's 256,000 tokens. Sakana Namazu can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sakana AI
Sakana Namazu
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Sakana Namazu supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Sakana Namazu can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sakana Namazu

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Sakana Namazu was released on 2026-08-03.

GLM-5.3 is 0 month newer than Sakana Namazu.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer
Sakana Namazu

Aug 3, 2026

3 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from Novita, ZAI. Sakana Namazu is available from Sakana AI.

GLM-5.3

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Sakana Namazu

sakana logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazu side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Sakana Namazu
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Sakana Namazu.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Sakana Namazu?

GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) and Sakana Namazu (Sakana AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Sakana Namazu in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Sakana Namazu scores AIME 2026: 96.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, MMLU-Pro: 90.3%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Sakana Namazu?

Sakana Namazu is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via novita. Sakana Namazu costs $0.95/M input and $4.00/M output via sakana.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazu?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Sakana Namazu supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazu?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.95/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Sakana Namazu?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Sakana Namazu is developed by Sakana AI.