The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Seed 2.1 Pro

GLM-5.3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Zhipu AI · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (CyberGym, Humanity's Last Exam, NL2Repo, PostTrainBench, Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon), while Seed 2.1 Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, Program Bench). GLM-5.3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 8 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Seed 2.1 Pro

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
6 of 8
2 of 8
Input price
$1.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
Released
Aug 2026
Jun 2026
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (CyberGym, Humanity's Last Exam, NL2Repo, PostTrainBench, Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon), while Seed 2.1 Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, Program Bench).

GLM-5.3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5.3 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only GLM-5.3 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.1 Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Seed 2.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

Seed 2.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Seed 2.1 Pro was released on 2026-06-24.

GLM-5.3 is 2 months newer than Seed 2.1 Pro.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Seed 2.1 Pro

Jun 24, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Seed 2.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.1 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Seed 2.1 Pro.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Seed 2.1 Pro?

GLM-5.3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and Seed 2.1 Pro is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Seed 2.1 Pro in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Seed 2.1 Pro scores CharXiv-D: 95.5%, MathVision: 94.5%, MathVista: 90.7%, MathVerse: 89.7%, Video-MME: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Seed 2.1 Pro?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Seed 2.1 Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Seed 2.1 Pro?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Seed 2.1 Pro?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Seed 2.1 Pro is developed by ByteDance.