GLM-5V-Turbo vs Mercury 3
GLM-5V-Turbo and Mercury 3 are closely matched at 30.0 and 36.1 on the LLM Stats Score. Mercury 3 is 11.7x cheaper per token.
Zhipu AI · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GLM-5V-Turbo and Mercury 3 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 30.0 and 36.1.
On price, Mercury 3 is roughly 11.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mercury 3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GLM-5V-Turbo
- you want predictable pricing at $1.20/M input and $4.00/M output
Choose Mercury 3
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 11.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
19 reported for GLM-5V-Turbo · 12 for Mercury 3
GLM-5V-Turbo and Mercury 3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens) is 11.4x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.35/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GLM-5V-Turbo is more expensive than Mercury 3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mercury 3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5V-Turbo's 200,000 tokens. Mercury 3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5V-Turbo is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
GLM-5V-Turbo supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.
GLM-5V-Turbo can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
GLM-5V-Turbo
Mercury 3
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.
Mercury 3 is 7 months newer than GLM-5V-Turbo.
Apr 2, 2026
6 months ago
Oct 19, 2026
3 days ago
6mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI. Mercury 3 is available from Inception.
GLM-5V-Turbo
Mercury 3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GLM-5V-Turbo and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GLM-5V-Turbo vs Mercury 3.