Model Comparison

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude 3 Haiku

Claude 3 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

GPT-3.5 Turbo outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Claude 3 Haiku is better at 5 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU).

Claude 3 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, GPT-3.5 Turbo ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-3.5 Turbo ($1.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-3.5 Turbo is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerAzure
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16,385 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-3.5 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input16,385 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-3.5 Turbo does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-3.5 Turbo was released on 2023-03-21, while Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13.

Claude 3 Haiku is 12 months newer than GPT-3.5 Turbo.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Mar 21, 2023

3.0 years ago

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-3.5 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2021-09-30, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-3.5 Turbo's training data extends to 2021-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Sep 2021

Claude 3 Haiku

—

Provider Availability

GPT-3.5 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI. Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Higher MATH score (43.1% vs 38.9%)
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher DROP score (78.4% vs 70.2%)
Higher GPQA score (33.3% vs 30.8%)
Higher HumanEval score (75.9% vs 68.0%)
Higher MGSM score (75.1% vs 56.3%)
Higher MMLU score (75.2% vs 69.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude 3 Haiku

Claude 3 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-3.5 Turbo is made by OpenAI and Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-3.5 Turbo scores DROP: 70.2%, MMLU: 69.8%, HumanEval: 68.0%, MGSM: 56.3%, MATH: 43.1%. Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%.
Claude 3 Haiku is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via azure. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic.
GPT-3.5 Turbo supports 16K tokens and Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (16K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-3.5 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.