Model Comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3 30B A3BWhich is better in 2026?
Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 5.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3 30B A3B — which is better?
GPT-3.5 Turbo (by OpenAI) and Qwen3 30B A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
GPT-3.5 Turbo outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 30B A3B also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
GPT-3.5 Turbo outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-3.5 Turbo ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-3.5 Turbo ($1.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-3.5 Turbo is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 30B A3B accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16,385 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-3.5 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT-3.5 Turbo is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-3.5 Turbo was released on 2023-03-21, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.
Qwen3 30B A3B is 26 months newer than GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Mar 21, 2023
3.2 years ago
Apr 29, 2025
1.1 years ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-3.5 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2021-09-30, while Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-3.5 Turbo's training data extends to 2021-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date.
Sep 2021
—
Provider Availability
GPT-3.5 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Qwen3 30B A3B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Qwen3 30B A3B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3 30B A3B.