The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4 vs GPT OSS 120B

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 208.3x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-4 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU). GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 208.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT OSS 120B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4

  • you want predictable pricing at $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output

Choose GPT OSS 120B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 208.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$30.00 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$60.00 / M
$0.45 / M
Context window
32,768
131,072
Released
Jun 2023
Aug 2025
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GPT-4 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU).

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens) is 333.3x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 133.3x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.45
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT OSS 120B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-4 is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT OSS 120B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 120B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT OSS 120B is 26 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.2 years ago

GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

2.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

GPT OSS 120B

Provider Availability

GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

GPT OSS 120B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 and GPT OSS 120B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 120B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs GPT OSS 120B.

Which is better, GPT-4 or GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4 compare to GPT OSS 120B in benchmarks?

GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%.

Is GPT-4 cheaper than GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B is 333.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 costs $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 and GPT OSS 120B?

GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 and GPT OSS 120B?

Key differences include context window (33K vs 131K), input pricing ($30.00 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.