The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4 vs o1-preview

o1-preview leads the LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 3.2. o1-preview is 1.4x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1-preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 3.2, ranking #208 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1-preview wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, o1-preview is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

o1-preview also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4

  • you want predictable pricing at $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output

Choose o1-preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.7 and ranks #208 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.2
#298
16.7
#208
3.3
#289
17.0
#201
-5.1
#251
-2.9
#243
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
$30.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$60.00 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
32,768
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4
o1-preview
8.8#251
20.4#151
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for GPT-4 · 8 for o1-preview

4 shared

GPT-4 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-preview is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM, MMLU).

o1-preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o1-preview costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens) costs the same as o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than o1-preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o1-preview accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input128,000 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-preview does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12.

o1-preview is 15 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.2 years ago

o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while o1-preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1-preview's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

o1-preview

Provider Availability

GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI. o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure.

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

o1-preview

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $16.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $66.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 and o1-preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4
✓ Preferred
o1-preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs o1-preview.

Which is better, GPT-4 or o1-preview?

o1-preview leads the LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 3.2. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and o1-preview is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4 compare to o1-preview in benchmarks?

GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%.

Is GPT-4 cheaper than o1-preview?

o1-preview is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 costs $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure. o1-preview costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 and o1-preview?

GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and o1-preview supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 and o1-preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.2 vs 16.7), context window (33K vs 128K), input pricing ($30.00 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.