The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 9.7 to 3.0.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 9.7 to 3.0, ranking #268 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4

  • you want predictable pricing at $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 9.7 and ranks #268 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.0
#310
9.7
#268
3.0
#303
8.4
#272
-5.2
#260
12.4
#148
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
$30.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$60.00 / M
— / M
Context window
32,768

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
8.5#258
11.5#239
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for GPT-4 · 28 for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

4 shared

GPT-4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Sep 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only GPT-4 specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 21 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.3 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.5 years ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4 or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 9.7 to 3.0. GPT-4 is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4 compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-4 supports 33K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.0 vs 9.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.