Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo leads the LLM Stats Score 8.7 to -1.2. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 117.6x cheaper per token.
Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GPT-4 Turbo leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.7 to -1.2, ranking #309 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-4 Turbo wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 117.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
- cost matters — it's about 117.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
Choose GPT-4 Turbo
- overall performance matters — it scores 8.7 and ranks #309 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2024
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 6 for GPT-4 Turbo
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH).
GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 142.9x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can generate longer responses up to 8,192 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
GPT-4 Turbo
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09.
GPT-4 Turbo is 1 month newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.
Mar 15, 2024
2.6 years ago
Apr 9, 2024
2.6 years ago
3w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while GPT-4 Turbo has a cutoff of 2023-12-31.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has more recent training data (up to 2024-10-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4 Turbo (2023-12-31).
Oct 2024
10 mo newerDec 2023
Provider Availability
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
GPT-4 Turbo
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and GPT-4 Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GPT-4 Turbo.