The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 9.0.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 9.0, ranking #203 overall.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4 Turbo

  • you want predictable pricing at $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.3 and ranks #203 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.0
#278
20.3
#203
9.2
#274
19.2
#209
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$30.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4 Turbo
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
17.2#199
19.5#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for GPT-4 Turbo · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

2 shared

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 Turbo specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4 Turbo specifies output context (4,096 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 Turbo is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 18 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4 Turbo
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 9.0. GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4 Turbo compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.0 vs 20.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.