GPT-4o vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
GPT-4o and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched at 11.5 and 11.2 on the LLM Stats Score. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 43.8x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GPT-4o and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 11.5 and 11.2.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-4o wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is roughly 43.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) also accepts a larger context window (131,100 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GPT-4o
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
- cost matters — it's about 43.8x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,100 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
8 reported for GPT-4o · 4 for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
GPT-4o outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is better at 0 benchmarks.
GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) accepts 131,100 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can generate longer responses up to 131,100 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 4,096 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both GPT-4o and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
GPT-4o
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT-4o is licensed under a proprietary license, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 19 months newer than GPT-4o.
May 13, 2024
2.4 years ago
Dec 4, 2025
10 months ago
1.6yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI.
GPT-4o
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GPT-4o and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-4o vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).