Model Comparison

GPT-4o vs Qwen2 7B Instruct

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GPT-4o outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon May 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2 7B Instruct does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06, while Qwen2 7B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

GPT-4o is 0 month newer than Qwen2 7B Instruct.

GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.7 years ago

2w newer
Qwen2 7B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 25.3%)
Higher MMLU score (85.7% vs 70.5%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (74.7% vs 44.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o vs Qwen2 7B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4o or Qwen2 7B Instruct?

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o is made by OpenAI and Qwen2 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4o compare to Qwen2 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%. Qwen2 7B Instruct scores MT-Bench: 84.1%, GSM8k: 82.3%, HumanEval: 79.9%, C-Eval: 77.2%, AlignBench: 72.1%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

GPT-4o supports 128K tokens and Qwen2 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o and Qwen2 7B Instruct?

GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.