The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 13.8 to 3.6. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 2.1x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.8 to 3.6, ranking #257 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4o mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output

Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.8 and ranks #257 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.6
#323
13.8
#257
4.1
#313
11.7
#267
-0.6
#259
9.2
#187
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
$0.15 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
128,000
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4o mini
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
11.4#246
17.5#199
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-4o mini · 9 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

5 shared

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU).

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not.

GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct was released on 2024-12-06.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 5 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.2 years ago

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Dec 6, 2024

1.8 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Hyperbolic, Groq, Sambanova, Cerebras, Bedrock, Together, Fireworks.

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.32/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.59/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.90/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
cerebras logo
Cerebras
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.72/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.72/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.88/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o mini and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o mini
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 13.8 to 3.6. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores IFEval: 92.1%, MGSM: 91.1%, HumanEval: 88.4%, MBPP EvalPlus: 87.6%, MMLU: 86.0%.

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.6 vs 13.8), context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is developed by Meta.