The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4o mini vs QvQ-72B-Preview

GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched at 3.6 and 7.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 3.6 and 7.9.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, QvQ-72B-Preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4o mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.6
#315
7.9
#290
4.1
#305
8.2
#284
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
GPT-4o mini
QvQ-72B-Preview
11.4#243
9.6#255
-0.4#192
6.3#154
2.5#152
9.6#125
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-4o mini · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

2 shared

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QvQ-72B-Preview is better at 2 benchmarks (MathVista, MMMU).

QvQ-72B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o mini specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 5 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.2 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while QvQ-72B-Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without QvQ-72B-Preview's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

QvQ-72B-Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o mini
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or QvQ-72B-Preview?

GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 3.6 and 7.9. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.6 vs 7.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and QvQ-72B-Preview?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.