Model Comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct — which is better?

GPT-4o mini (by OpenAI) and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU). Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose GPT-4o mini if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o mini specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is 2 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (49.5% vs 40.2%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 87.2%)
Higher MATH score (83.1% vs 70.2%)
Higher MMLU score (83.3% vs 82.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o mini and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o mini
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.