Model Comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

GPT-4o mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

GPT-4o mini

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerAzure

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

GPT-4o mini

Input128,000 tokens

Output16,384 tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Fri May 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o mini

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 14 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-4o mini

Azure

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

GPT-4o mini

View details

OpenAI

Higher MMLU score (82.0% vs 77.2%)

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	GPT-4o mini	Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 94.0%, OCRBench: 88.1%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.1%, AI2D: 84.1%.

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.