The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4o mini vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 14.1 to 3.8. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is 1.4x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 14.1 to 3.8, ranking #228 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-4o mini wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4o mini

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 14.1 and ranks #228 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.8
#295
14.1
#228
4.2
#285
11.4
#244
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.15 / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
128,000
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
GPT-4o mini
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
11.8#234
12.3#226
0.0#179
10.5#118
2.9#141
12.0#106
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-4o mini · 46 for Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

1 shared

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is 14 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.69/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o mini
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 14.1 to 3.8. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 94.4%, OCRBench: 89.6%, AI2D: 85.7%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.0%.

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs $0.08/M input and $0.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.8 vs 14.1), context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.08/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.