The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5 vs o1-preview

GPT-5 leads the LLM Stats Score 33.8 to 16.6. GPT-5 is 7.6x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 33.8 to 16.6, ranking #104 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GPT-5 is roughly 7.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5 also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 33.8 and ranks #104 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 7.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose o1-preview

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
33.8
#104
16.6
#227
34.2
#97
16.8
#220
26.4
#71
-3.2
#259
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$1.25 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
400,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5
o1-preview
31.5#67
20.2#163
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

34 reported for GPT-5 · 8 for o1-preview

4 shared

GPT-5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while o1-preview is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

GPT-5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5 costs less

For input processing, GPT-5 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.0x cheaper than o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 6.0x cheaper than o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than GPT-5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to o1-preview's 128,000 tokens. GPT-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o1-preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input128,000 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Sep 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-preview does not.

GPT-5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5 was released on 2025-08-07, while o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12.

GPT-5 is 11 months newer than o1-preview.

GPT-5

Aug 7, 2025

1.1 years ago

10mo newer
o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-30, while o1-preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5's training data extends to 2024-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1-preview's cutoff date.

GPT-5

Sep 2024

o1-preview

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5 is available from OpenAI. o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure.

GPT-5

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

o1-preview

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $16.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $66.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5 and o1-preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5
✓ Preferred
o1-preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5 vs o1-preview.

Which is better, GPT-5 or o1-preview?

GPT-5 leads the LLM Stats Score 33.8 to 16.6. GPT-5 is made by OpenAI and o1-preview is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5 compare to o1-preview in benchmarks?

GPT-5 scores SWE-Lancer (IC-Diamond subset): 100.0%, COLLIE: 99.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 96.7%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 95.2%, AIME 2025: 94.6%. o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%.

Is GPT-5 cheaper than o1-preview?

GPT-5 is 12.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. o1-preview costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5 and o1-preview?

GPT-5 supports 400K tokens and o1-preview supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5 and o1-preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.8 vs 16.6), context window (400K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.