The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5 nano vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

GPT-5 nano leads the LLM Stats Score 19.6 to 5.3.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5 nano leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.6 to 5.3, ranking #192 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5 nano wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5 nano

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.6 and ranks #192 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.6
#192
5.3
#286
19.0
#192
1.6
#298
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
400,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5 nano
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
19.3#162
5.5#264
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for GPT-5 nano · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

1 shared

GPT-5 nano outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5 nano significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5 nano specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5 nano specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5 nano
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5 nano and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5 nano is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5 nano was released on 2025-08-07, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

GPT-5 nano is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

GPT-5 nano

Aug 7, 2025

1.1 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-30, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Omni-7B's cutoff date.

GPT-5 nano

May 2024

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5 nano and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5 nano
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5 nano vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, GPT-5 nano or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

GPT-5 nano leads the LLM Stats Score 19.6 to 5.3. GPT-5 nano is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5 nano compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

GPT-5 nano scores AIME 2025: 85.2%, HMMT 2025: 75.6%, GPQA: 71.2%, FrontierMath: 9.6%, Humanity's Last Exam: 8.7%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5 nano and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

GPT-5 nano supports 400K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5 nano and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.6 vs 5.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5 nano and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

GPT-5 nano is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.