The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5 nano vs Sarvam-30B

GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B are closely matched at 19.1 and 19.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

OpenAI · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 19.1 and 19.2.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5 nano wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5 nano

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Sarvam-30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.1
#229
19.2
#226
18.4
#229
19.0
#224
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
400,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5 nano
Sarvam-30B
18.9#181
23.5#137
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for GPT-5 nano · 14 for Sarvam-30B

3 shared

GPT-5 nano outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, HMMT 2025), while Sarvam-30B is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

GPT-5 nano shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5 nano specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5 nano specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5 nano
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5 nano supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-30B does not.

GPT-5 nano can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5 nano is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5 nano was released on 2025-08-07, while Sarvam-30B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-30B is 7 months newer than GPT-5 nano.

GPT-5 nano

Aug 7, 2025

1.2 years ago

Sarvam-30B

Mar 6, 2026

7 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-30, while Sarvam-30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Sarvam-30B's cutoff date.

GPT-5 nano

May 2024

Sarvam-30B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5 nano
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5 nano vs Sarvam-30B.

Which is better, GPT-5 nano or Sarvam-30B?

GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 19.1 and 19.2. GPT-5 nano is made by OpenAI and Sarvam-30B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5 nano compare to Sarvam-30B in benchmarks?

GPT-5 nano scores AIME 2025: 85.2%, HMMT 2025: 75.6%, GPQA: 71.2%, FrontierMath: 9.6%, Humanity's Last Exam: 8.7%. Sarvam-30B scores MATH-500: 97.0%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MBPP: 92.7%, HumanEval: 92.1%, MMLU: 85.1%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B?

GPT-5 nano supports 400K tokens and Sarvam-30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.1 vs 19.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5 nano and Sarvam-30B?

GPT-5 nano is developed by OpenAI and Sarvam-30B is developed by Sarvam AI.