Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Codex High vs Qwen3 30B A3B

GPT-5.1 Codex High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 22.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-5.1 Codex High outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.1 Codex High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.1 Codex High ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.1 Codex High ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.1 Codex High is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex High
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.1 Codex High accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex High
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.1 Codex High supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.

GPT-5.1 Codex High can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.1 Codex High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 30B A3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.1 Codex High is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.1 Codex High

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Codex High was released on 2025-11-12, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

GPT-5.1 Codex High is 7 months newer than Qwen3 30B A3B.

GPT-5.1 Codex High

Nov 12, 2025

5 months ago

6mo newer
Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-5.1 Codex High is available from OpenAI. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

GPT-5.1 Codex High

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (96.7% vs 70.9%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex High
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Codex High vs Qwen3 30B A3B

GPT-5.1 Codex High significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Codex High is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.1 Codex High scores AIME 2025: 96.7%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.
Qwen3 30B A3B is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex High costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.
GPT-5.1 Codex High supports 400K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (400K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.1 Codex High is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.