The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.1 Instant vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna leads the LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 36.5. GPT-6 Luna is 17.2x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Luna leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 36.5, ranking #41 overall.

On price, GPT-6 Luna is roughly 17.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Luna also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.1 Instant

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output

Choose GPT-6 Luna

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.5 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • cost matters — it's about 17.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
36.5
#81
44.5
#41
36.2
#82
40.0
#58
21.4
#94
31.4
#47
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
400,000
1,050,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5.1 Instant
GPT-6 Luna
16.8#78
22.1#47
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-5.1 Instant · 5 for GPT-6 Luna

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-6 Lunadon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-6 Luna costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.1 Instant ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than GPT-6 Luna ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.1 Instant ($10.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than GPT-6 Luna ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.1 Instant is more expensive than GPT-6 Luna.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Instant
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Luna accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to GPT-5.1 Instant's 400,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Instant
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-6 Luna support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.1 Instant

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.1 Instant

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Luna

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Instant was released on 2025-11-12, while GPT-6 Luna was released on 2026-09-22.

GPT-6 Luna is 10 months newer than GPT-5.1 Instant.

GPT-5.1 Instant

Nov 12, 2025

10 months ago

GPT-6 Luna

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-18, while GPT-5.1 Instant's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-05-18, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.1 Instant's cutoff date.

GPT-5.1 Instant

GPT-6 Luna

May 2026

Provider Availability

GPT-5.1 Instant is available from OpenAI. GPT-6 Luna is available from OpenAI.

GPT-5.1 Instant

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

GPT-6 Luna

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-6 Luna side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.1 Instant
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Luna
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Instant vs GPT-6 Luna.

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Instant or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna leads the LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 36.5. GPT-5.1 Instant is made by OpenAI and GPT-6 Luna is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.1 Instant compare to GPT-6 Luna in benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 Instant scores Tau2 Telecom: 95.6%, AIME 2025: 94.0%, BrowseComp Long Context 128k: 90.0%, GPQA: 88.1%, MMMU: 85.4%. GPT-6 Luna scores DeepSWE 1.1: 66.6%, OSWorld 2.0: 52.7%, Agents' Last Exam: 50.9%, FrontierCode 1.1: 42.4%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 20.7%.

Is GPT-5.1 Instant cheaper than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.1 Instant costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-5.1 Instant supports 400K tokens and GPT-6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-6 Luna?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.5 vs 44.5), context window (400K vs 1.1M), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.