Model Comparison

GPT-5.1 Medium vs Jamba 1.5 LargeWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing GPT-5.1 Medium and Jamba 1.5 Large across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: GPT-5.1 Medium vs Jamba 1.5 Large — which is better?

GPT-5.1 Medium (by OpenAI) and Jamba 1.5 Large (by AI21 Labs) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-5.1 Medium also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GPT-5.1 Medium if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.1 Medium and Jamba 1.5 Largedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.1 Medium costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.1 Medium ($1.25/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.1 Medium ($10.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Large ($8.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Large is more expensive than GPT-5.1 Medium.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Medium
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.1 Medium accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Jamba 1.5 Large's 256,000 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while GPT-5.1 Medium is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Medium
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.1 Medium supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

GPT-5.1 Medium can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.1 Medium is licensed under a proprietary license, while Jamba 1.5 Large uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Medium was released on 2025-11-12, while Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22.

GPT-5.1 Medium is 15 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Nov 12, 2025

7 months ago

1.2yr newer
Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while GPT-5.1 Medium's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.1 Medium's cutoff date.

GPT-5.1 Medium

—

Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Provider Availability

GPT-5.1 Medium is available from OpenAI. Jamba 1.5 Large is available from Bedrock, Google.

GPT-5.1 Medium

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Jamba 1.5 Large

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
AI21 Labs
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Medium
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Medium vs Jamba 1.5 Large.

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Medium or Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-5.1 Medium (OpenAI) and Jamba 1.5 Large (AI21 Labs) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-5.1 Medium compare to Jamba 1.5 Large in benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 Medium scores AIME 2025: 98.4%. Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%.

Is GPT-5.1 Medium cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-5.1 Medium is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.1 Medium costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.1 Medium and Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-5.1 Medium supports 400K tokens and Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.1 Medium and Jamba 1.5 Large?

Key differences include context window (400K vs 256K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.1 Medium and Jamba 1.5 Large?

GPT-5.1 Medium is developed by OpenAI and Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs.

Related comparisons