The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.1 Medium vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

GPT-5.1 Medium leads the LLM Stats Score 31.2 to 21.0. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 39.3x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.1 Medium leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.2 to 21.0, ranking #112 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is roughly 39.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.1 Medium also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.1 Medium

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.2 and ranks #112 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 39.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
31.2
#112
21.0
#190
31.0
#111
19.7
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
400,000
262,144

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-5.1 Medium · 15 for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

1 shared

GPT-5.1 Medium outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.1 Medium ($1.25/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.1 Medium ($10.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.1 Medium is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Medium
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.1 Medium accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-5.1 Medium is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Medium
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.1 Medium supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

GPT-5.1 Medium can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.1 Medium is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Medium was released on 2025-11-12, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 1 month newer than GPT-5.1 Medium.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Nov 12, 2025

10 months ago

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while GPT-5.1 Medium's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-5.1 Medium's cutoff date.

GPT-5.1 Medium

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Provider Availability

GPT-5.1 Medium is available from OpenAI. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-5.1 Medium

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.1 Medium and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.1 Medium
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Medium vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Medium or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

GPT-5.1 Medium leads the LLM Stats Score 31.2 to 21.0. GPT-5.1 Medium is made by OpenAI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.1 Medium compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 Medium scores AIME 2025: 98.4%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

Is GPT-5.1 Medium cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.1 Medium costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.1 Medium and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

GPT-5.1 Medium supports 400K tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.1 Medium and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.2 vs 21.0), context window (400K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.05/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.1 Medium and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

GPT-5.1 Medium is developed by OpenAI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.