The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.1 Thinking vs Muse Wonder Full

Comparing GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Full across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Full trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.1 Thinking

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-5.1 Thinking
OpenAI
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
400,000
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-5.1 Thinking · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.1 Thinking specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.1 Thinking specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Thinking was released on 2025-11-12, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 11 months newer than GPT-5.1 Thinking.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Nov 12, 2025

11 months ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.1 Thinking
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Thinking vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Thinking or Muse Wonder Full?

GPT-5.1 Thinking (OpenAI) and Muse Wonder Full (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-5.1 Thinking compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 Thinking scores Tau2 Telecom: 95.6%, AIME 2025: 94.0%, BrowseComp Long Context 128k: 90.0%, GPQA: 88.1%, MMMU: 85.4%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Full?

GPT-5.1 Thinking supports 400K tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes GPT-5.1 Thinking and Muse Wonder Full?

GPT-5.1 Thinking is developed by OpenAI and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons