The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.1 Thinking vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

GPT-5.1 Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 36.5 to 2.0. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 38.2x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.1 Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.5 to 2.0, ranking #80 overall.

On price, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is roughly 38.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.1 Thinking also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.1 Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 36.5 and ranks #80 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 38.2x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
36.5
#80
2.0
#323
36.3
#79
2.0
#313
21.6
#92
10.0
#172
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
400,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
30.0#79
4.9#278
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-5.1 Thinking · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.1 Thinking and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.1 Thinking ($1.25/1M tokens) is 13.9x more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.1 Thinking ($10.00/1M tokens) is 111.1x more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.1 Thinking is more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.09
Best providerLambda
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.1 Thinking accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.1 Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct does not.

GPT-5.1 Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.1 Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.1 Thinking was released on 2025-11-12, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

GPT-5.1 Thinking is 14 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Nov 12, 2025

10 months ago

1.1yr newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-5.1 Thinking is available from OpenAI. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks.

GPT-5.1 Thinking

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.09/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.1 Thinking and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.1 Thinking
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.1 Thinking vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-5.1 Thinking or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

GPT-5.1 Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 36.5 to 2.0. GPT-5.1 Thinking is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.1 Thinking compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 Thinking scores Tau2 Telecom: 95.6%, AIME 2025: 94.0%, BrowseComp Long Context 128k: 90.0%, GPQA: 88.1%, MMMU: 85.4%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

Is GPT-5.1 Thinking cheaper than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 13.9x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.1 Thinking costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output via lambda.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.1 Thinking and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

GPT-5.1 Thinking supports 400K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.1 Thinking and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.5 vs 2.0), context window (400K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.1 Thinking and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

GPT-5.1 Thinking is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.