The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.2 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 41.1.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 41.1, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.2

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-5.2
OpenAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
41.1
#64
51.0
#15
Reasoning
40.5
#61
47.5
#26
Coding
23.3
#88
38.8
#18
Agents
14.4
#103
38.0
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$1.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$14.00 / M
— / M
Context window
400,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5.2
Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool use
17.9#78
29.0#16
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for GPT-5.2 · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.2 and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.2 specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.2 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

GPT-5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 10 months newer than GPT-5.2.

GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

10 months ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.2 and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.2
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.2 vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 41.1. GPT-5.2 is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.2 compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-5.2 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 99.4%, Tau2 Telecom: 98.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 94.0%, GPQA: 92.4%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.2 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.2 supports 400K tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.2 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.1 vs 51.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.2 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons