The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

GPT-5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 41.4 to 28.1. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 4.9x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.2 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.4 to 28.1, ranking #54 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5.2 wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is roughly 4.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.2 also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.2

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.4 and ranks #54 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

  • cost matters — it's about 4.9x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
41.4
#54
28.1
#138
40.7
#52
28.4
#131
14.8
#90
11.4
#111
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
5 of 5
0 of 5
Input price
$1.75 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$14.00 / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
400,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
GPT-5.2
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
37.8#29
31.3#69
27.8#36
12.1#107
17.9#69
10.6#123
25.3#6
16.4#38
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for GPT-5.2 · 25 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

5 shared

GPT-5.2 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 5.8x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.2 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-5.2 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 does not.

GPT-5.2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

GPT-5.2 is 5 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date.

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Provider Availability

GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

GPT-5.2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.2 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.2
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

GPT-5.2 leads the LLM Stats Score 41.4 to 28.1. GPT-5.2 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.2 compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

GPT-5.2 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 99.4%, Tau2 Telecom: 98.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 94.0%, GPQA: 92.4%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

Is GPT-5.2 cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 5.8x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.2 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

GPT-5.2 supports 400K tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.2 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.4 vs 28.1), context window (400K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.75 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.2 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.