The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 36.6. Muse Spark 1.3 is 38.5x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 36.6, ranking #4 overall.

On price, Muse Spark 1.3 is roughly 38.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 38.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
36.6
#74
55.1
#4
37.3
#68
52.6
#7
30.1
#51
41.9
#9
22.9
#55
40.6
#4
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$1.75 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$14.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
400,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for GPT-5.3 Codex · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.3 Codex ($1.75/1M tokens) is 17.5x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.3 Codex ($14.00/1M tokens) is 70.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.3 Codex is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-5.3 Codex's 400,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while GPT-5.3 Codex is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Spark 1.3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.3 Codex

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.3 Codex

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.3 Codex was released on 2026-02-05, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 7 months newer than GPT-5.3 Codex.

GPT-5.3 Codex

Feb 5, 2026

7 months ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

6 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-5.3 Codex is available from OpenAI. Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API.

GPT-5.3 Codex

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.3 Codex
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.3 Codex vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, GPT-5.3 Codex or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 36.6. GPT-5.3 Codex is made by OpenAI and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.3 Codex compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores SWE-Lancer (IC-Diamond subset): 81.4%, Cybersecurity CTFs: 77.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 77.3%, LiveBench: 72.8%, OSWorld-Verified: 64.7%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is 17.5x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-5.3 Codex supports 400K tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.6 vs 55.1), context window (400K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.75 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-5.3 Codex is developed by OpenAI and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.