The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct are closely matched at 26.6 and 24.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 1.3x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 26.6 and 24.7.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.4 nano also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.4 nano

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
26.6
#150
24.7
#162
27.5
#136
22.5
#170
11.0
#112
12.6
#100
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
$0.88 / M
Context window
400,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
GPT-5.4 nano
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
21.5#145
23.8#124
9.5#125
17.9#81
10.4#71
15.0#51
11.0#112
20.6#65
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for GPT-5.4 nano · 50 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

1 shared

GPT-5.4 nano outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.4 nano ($0.20/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.4 nano ($1.25/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.88/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.4 nano is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.88
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.4 nano accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-5.4 nano is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.4 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.4 nano is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.4 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 nano was released on 2026-03-17, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

GPT-5.4 nano is 6 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

GPT-5.4 nano

Mar 17, 2026

6 months ago

5mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.4 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-31, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.4 nano's training data extends to 2025-08-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-5.4 nano

Aug 2025

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Provider Availability

GPT-5.4 nano is available from OpenAI. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

GPT-5.4 nano

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.4 nano
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 26.6 and 24.7. GPT-5.4 nano is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.4 nano compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 nano scores Tau2 Telecom: 92.5%, GPQA: 82.8%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 75.8%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 73.4%, LiveBench: 70.1%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%.

Is GPT-5.4 nano cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Both models cost $0.20 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano supports 400K tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.6 vs 24.7), context window (400K vs 262K), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.