The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

GPT-5.4 nano leads the LLM Stats Score 26.6 to 20.3.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.4 nano leads the overall LLM Stats Score 26.6 to 20.3, ranking #150 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5.4 nano wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.4 nano

  • overall performance matters — it scores 26.6 and ranks #150 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
26.6
#150
20.3
#195
27.5
#136
19.2
#201
11.0
#112
9.6
#122
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Context window
400,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
GPT-5.4 nano
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
21.5#145
19.5#167
9.5#125
14.9#90
11.0#112
17.4#77
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for GPT-5.4 nano · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

2 shared

GPT-5.4 nano outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 nano significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.4 nano specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.4 nano specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.4 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.4 nano is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.4 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 nano was released on 2026-03-17, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

GPT-5.4 nano is 6 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

GPT-5.4 nano

Mar 17, 2026

6 months ago

5mo newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.4 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-31, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.4 nano's training data extends to 2025-08-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-5.4 nano

Aug 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.4 nano
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano leads the LLM Stats Score 26.6 to 20.3. GPT-5.4 nano is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.4 nano compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 nano scores Tau2 Telecom: 92.5%, GPQA: 82.8%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 75.8%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 73.4%, LiveBench: 70.1%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano supports 400K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.6 vs 20.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.