Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-4.7-Flash is 36.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GPT-5.4 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while GLM-4.7-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.4 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 35.7x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.4 is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerOpenAI
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.4 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's 128,000 tokens. GPT-5.4 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.7-Flash does not.

GPT-5.4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.7-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.7-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.4

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.4 was released on 2026-03-05, while GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19.

GPT-5.4 is 2 months newer than GLM-4.7-Flash.

GPT-5.4

Mar 5, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-5.4 is available from OpenAI. GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI.

GPT-5.4

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GLM-4.7-Flash

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher BrowseComp score (82.7% vs 42.8%)
Higher GPQA score (92.8% vs 75.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.8% vs 14.4%)
Zhipu AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.4 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

GPT-5.4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.4 is made by OpenAI and GLM-4.7-Flash is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.4 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.9%, ARC-AGI: 93.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 93.0%, GPQA: 92.8%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 89.8%. GLM-4.7-Flash scores AIME 2025: 91.6%, Tau-bench: 79.5%, GPQA: 75.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.2%, BrowseComp: 42.8%.
GLM-4.7-Flash is 35.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.4 costs $2.50/M input and $15.00/M output via openai. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.07/M input and $0.40/M output via z.
GPT-5.4 supports 1.0M tokens and GLM-4.7-Flash supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($2.50 vs $0.07/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.4 is developed by OpenAI and GLM-4.7-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI.