Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-4.7-Flash is 7.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while GLM-4.7-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's 128,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.7-Flash does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.7-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.7-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19.

GLM-4.7-Flash is 1 month newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

4 months ago

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

2 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GLM-4.7-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-4.7-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

GLM-4.7-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

GLM-4.7-Flash

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 91.6%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 75.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 14.4%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 59.2%)
Zhipu AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and GLM-4.7-Flash is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. GLM-4.7-Flash scores AIME 2025: 91.6%, Tau-bench: 79.5%, GPQA: 75.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.2%, BrowseComp: 42.8%.
GLM-4.7-Flash is 7.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.07/M input and $0.40/M output via z.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GLM-4.7-Flash supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.07/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and GLM-4.7-Flash is developed by Zhipu AI.