The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 47.3.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 47.3, ranking #14 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.5

  • you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.3
#31
51.1
#14
46.9
#29
47.7
#25
36.4
#25
39.2
#17
31.5
#34
38.3
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$30.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5.5
Ling 3.1 Flash
26.9#26
29.0#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for GPT-5.5 · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

3 shared

GPT-5.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ling 3.1 Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (CyberGym, Finance Agent v2, FrontierSWE).

Ling 3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.5 specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-5.5
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

GPT-5.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.5 was released on 2026-04-23, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 5 months newer than GPT-5.5.

GPT-5.5

Apr 23, 2026

5 months ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-12-01, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.5's training data extends to 2025-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-5.5

Dec 2025

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.5
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-5.5 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 47.3. GPT-5.5 is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.5 compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-5.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.0%, ARC-AGI: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.6%, ARC-AGI v2: 85.0%, GDPval-MM: 84.9%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.5 supports 1.1M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.3 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.5 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.