The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 54.4 to 44.5. GPT-6 Luna is 56.3x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.6 Sol leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.4 to 44.5, ranking #5 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5.6 Sol wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GPT-6 Luna is roughly 56.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.4 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results

Choose GPT-6 Luna

  • cost matters — it's about 56.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
54.4
#5
44.5
#41
53.2
#5
40.0
#58
45.5
#3
31.4
#47
40.6
#3
31.8
#30
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$5.00 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$30.00 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,050,000
1,050,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-6 Luna
29.1#14
22.1#47
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

45 reported for GPT-5.6 Sol · 5 for GPT-6 Luna

4 shared

GPT-5.6 Sol outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, DeepSWE 1.1, FrontierCode 1.1, OSWorld 2.0), while GPT-6 Luna is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Sol significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-6 Luna costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.6 Sol ($5.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than GPT-6 Luna ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.6 Sol ($30.00/1M tokens) is 60.0x more expensive than GPT-6 Luna ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.6 Sol is more expensive than GPT-6 Luna.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,050,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Luna

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.6 Sol was released on 2026-07-09, while GPT-6 Luna was released on 2026-09-22.

GPT-6 Luna is 3 months newer than GPT-5.6 Sol.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Jul 9, 2026

2 months ago

GPT-6 Luna

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.6 Sol has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-16, while GPT-6 Luna has a cutoff of 2026-05-18.

GPT-6 Luna has more recent training data (up to 2026-05-18), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-5.6 Sol (2026-02-16).

GPT-5.6 Sol

Feb 2026

GPT-6 Luna

May 2026

3 mo newer

Provider Availability

GPT-5.6 Sol is available from OpenAI. GPT-6 Luna is available from OpenAI.

GPT-5.6 Sol

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

GPT-6 Luna

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.6 Sol
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Luna
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Sol or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 54.4 to 44.5. GPT-5.6 Sol is made by OpenAI and GPT-6 Luna is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.6 Sol compare to GPT-6 Luna in benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Sol scores Connectors: 100.0%, Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal): 96.7%, HealthBench Consensus: 95.5%, GPQA: 94.6%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 91.5%. GPT-6 Luna scores DeepSWE 1.1: 66.6%, OSWorld 2.0: 52.7%, Agents' Last Exam: 50.9%, FrontierCode 1.1: 42.4%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 20.7%.

Is GPT-5.6 Sol cheaper than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.6 Sol costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output via openai. GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Sol supports 1.1M tokens and GPT-6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.4 vs 44.5), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.