The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Astra vs o4-mini

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 60.7 to 27.7. o4-mini is 10.4x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Astra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 60.7 to 27.7, ranking #1 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-6 Astra wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, o4-mini is roughly 10.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Astra also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Astra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 60.7 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o4-mini

  • cost matters — it's about 10.4x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
60.7
#1
27.7
#132
58.7
#1
27.8
#124
49.0
#1
12.2
#143
46.4
#1
7.8
#128
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$10.00 / M
$1.10 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
1,050,000
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
GPT-6 Astra
o4-mini
35.3#42
27.8#91
41.5#1
16.1#84
36.6#1
11.8#106
38.6#3
22.3#57
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for GPT-6 Astra · 14 for o4-mini

2 shared

GPT-6 Astra outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA), while o4-mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-6 Astra significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o4-mini costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Astra ($10.00/1M tokens) is 9.1x more expensive than o4-mini ($1.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Astra ($50.00/1M tokens) is 11.4x more expensive than o4-mini ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Astra is more expensive than o4-mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerOpenAI
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Astra accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to o4-mini's 200,000 tokens. GPT-6 Astra can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o4-mini is limited to 100,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Astra and o4-mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Astra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o4-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

Closed source

o4-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Astra was released on 2026-09-04, while o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16.

GPT-6 Astra is 17 months newer than o4-mini.

GPT-6 Astra

Sep 4, 2026

1 days ago

1.4yr newer
o4-mini

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Astra has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-30, while o4-mini has a cutoff of 2024-05-31.

GPT-6 Astra has more recent training data (up to 2026-04-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to o4-mini (2024-05-31).

GPT-6 Astra

Apr 2026

1.9 yr newer
o4-mini

May 2024

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Astra is available from OpenAI. o4-mini is available from OpenAI.

GPT-6 Astra

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

o4-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Astra and o4-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Astra
✓ Preferred
o4-mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Astra vs o4-mini.

Which is better, GPT-6 Astra or o4-mini?

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 60.7 to 27.7. GPT-6 Astra is made by OpenAI and o4-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Astra compare to o4-mini in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores ExploitBench: 100.0%, ARC-AGI-3: 99.9%, ARC-AGI: 98.5%, FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): 97.6%, GPQA: 96.0%. o4-mini scores AIME 2024: 93.4%, AIME 2025: 92.7%, MathVista: 84.3%, MMMU: 81.6%, GPQA: 81.4%.

Is GPT-6 Astra cheaper than o4-mini?

o4-mini is 9.1x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via openai. o4-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Astra and o4-mini?

GPT-6 Astra supports 1.1M tokens and o4-mini supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Astra and o4-mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (60.7 vs 27.7), context window (1.1M vs 200K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $1.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.