The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 59.9 to 16.4. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 76.2x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Astra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.9 to 16.4, ranking #1 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-6 Astra wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 76.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Astra also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Astra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.9 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 76.2x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
59.9
#1
16.4
#222
57.9
#1
15.0
#225
46.4
#1
4.5
#154
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$10.00 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$50.00 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,050,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
GPT-6 Astra
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
36.0#42
16.5#202
41.8#2
11.3#109
39.0#2
13.8#95
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for GPT-6 Astra · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

2 shared

GPT-6 Astra outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, ScreenSpot Pro), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-6 Astra significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Astra ($10.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Astra ($50.00/1M tokens) is 83.3x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Astra is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$50.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Astra accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-6 Astra is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Astra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6 Astra is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6 Astra

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Astra was released on 2026-09-04, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

GPT-6 Astra is 12 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

GPT-6 Astra

Sep 4, 2026

5 days ago

11mo newer
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Astra has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Astra's training data extends to 2026-04-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Astra

Apr 2026

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Astra is available from OpenAI. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

GPT-6 Astra

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $50.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Astra
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-6 Astra leads the LLM Stats Score 59.9 to 16.4. GPT-6 Astra is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Astra compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Astra scores ExploitBench: 100.0%, ARC-AGI-3: 99.9%, ARC-AGI: 98.5%, FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): 97.6%, GPQA: 96.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

Is GPT-6 Astra cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 66.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00/M input and $50.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-6 Astra supports 1.1M tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.9 vs 16.4), context window (1.1M vs 262K), input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-6 Astra is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.