The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs Muse Spark 1.1

GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched at 40.8 and 47.8 on the LLM Stats Score. Muse Spark 1.1 is 20.0x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.8 and 47.8.

On price, Muse Spark 1.1 is roughly 20.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • cost matters — it's about 20.0x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.8
#82
47.8
#35
Coding
32.7
#47
31.2
#58
Agents
30.5
#49
31.6
#44
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
1,050,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 11 for Muse Spark 1.1

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.1 costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens) is 16.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens) is 23.5x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Muse Spark 1.1's 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

GPT-6 Cyber is 4 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.8 and 47.8. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is GPT-6 Cyber cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is 16.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.8 vs 47.8), context window (1.1M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($20.00 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons