The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs Qwen3.8 Flash

GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash are closely matched at 40.8 and 47.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3.8 Flash is 173.9x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.8 and 47.4.

On price, Qwen3.8 Flash is roughly 173.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 173.9x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Qwen3.8 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.8
#82
47.4
#38
Coding
32.7
#47
31.8
#55
Agents
30.5
#49
31.5
#47
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
1,050,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens) is 133.3x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens) is 212.8x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.47/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.47
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3.8 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Nov 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

GPT-6 Cyber is 2 months newer than Qwen3.8 Flash.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI. Qwen3.8 Flash is available from Novita.

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M

Qwen3.8 Flash

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.47/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or Qwen3.8 Flash?

GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.8 and 47.4. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

Is GPT-6 Cyber cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is 133.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai. Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.8 vs 47.4), context window (1.1M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($20.00 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen3.8 Flash?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons