The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Luna vs Ling 3.1 Flash

GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched at 43.9 and 51.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.9 and 51.1.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Luna

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.9
#45
51.1
#14
Reasoning
39.5
#66
47.7
#25
Coding
30.6
#54
39.2
#17
Agents
30.8
#38
38.3
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-6 Luna
Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool use
21.3#53
29.0#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for GPT-6 Luna · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Luna specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Luna specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Luna supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

GPT-6 Luna can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Luna was released on 2026-09-22, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than GPT-6 Luna.

GPT-6 Luna

Sep 22, 2026

2 weeks ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-18, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-05-18, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Luna

May 2026

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Luna
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Luna vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-6 Luna or Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.9 and 51.1. GPT-6 Luna is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Luna compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Luna scores DeepSWE 1.1: 66.6%, OSWorld 2.0: 52.7%, Agents' Last Exam: 50.9%, FrontierCode 1.1: 42.4%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 20.7%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.9 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Luna and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-6 Luna is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons