The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Rosalind vs MAI-Thinking-1

Comparing GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Thinking-1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

OpenAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Thinking-1 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Rosalind

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose MAI-Thinking-1

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for GPT-6 Rosalind · 23 for MAI-Thinking-1

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Thinking-1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Rosalind supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Thinking-1 does not.

GPT-6 Rosalind can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Thinking-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Thinking-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Rosalind was released on 2026-10-30, while MAI-Thinking-1 was released on 2026-06-02.

GPT-6 Rosalind is 5 months newer than MAI-Thinking-1.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Oct 30, 2026

6 days ago

5mo newer
MAI-Thinking-1

Jun 2, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Thinking-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Rosalind
✓ Preferred
MAI-Thinking-1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Rosalind vs MAI-Thinking-1.

Which is better, GPT-6 Rosalind or MAI-Thinking-1?

GPT-6 Rosalind (OpenAI) and MAI-Thinking-1 (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-6 Rosalind compare to MAI-Thinking-1 in benchmarks?

MAI-Thinking-1 scores LongFact: 98.0%, AIME 2025: 97.0%, AIME 2026: 94.5%, GraphWalks: 90.0%, AIR-Bench: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Thinking-1?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Rosalind and MAI-Thinking-1?

GPT-6 Rosalind is developed by OpenAI and MAI-Thinking-1 is developed by Microsoft.