The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Sol vs GPT OSS 20B

GPT-6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 49.4 to 17.9. GPT OSS 20B is 69.6x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Sol leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.4 to 17.9, ranking #21 overall.

On price, GPT OSS 20B is roughly 69.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Sol also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Sol

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.4 and ranks #21 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose GPT OSS 20B

  • cost matters — it's about 69.6x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
49.4
#21
17.9
#222
45.6
#29
15.6
#228
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.03 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
1,050,000
131,072

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for GPT-6 Sol · 7 for GPT OSS 20B

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Sol and GPT OSS 20Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 20B costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Sol ($2.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than GPT OSS 20B ($0.03/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Sol ($10.00/1M tokens) is 71.4x more expensive than GPT OSS 20B ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Sol is more expensive than GPT OSS 20B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Sol accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 20B's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 20B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-6 Sol is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Sol supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 20B does not.

GPT-6 Sol can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT OSS 20B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6 Sol is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 20B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT OSS 20B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Sol was released on 2026-09-22, while GPT OSS 20B was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT-6 Sol is 14 months newer than GPT OSS 20B.

GPT-6 Sol

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.1yr newer
GPT OSS 20B

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-20, while GPT OSS 20B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Sol's training data extends to 2026-04-20, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 20B's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Sol

Apr 2026

GPT OSS 20B

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Sol is available from OpenAI. GPT OSS 20B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks, Groq, OpenAI.

GPT-6 Sol

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

GPT OSS 20B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Sol and GPT OSS 20B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Sol
✓ Preferred
GPT OSS 20B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Sol vs GPT OSS 20B.

Which is better, GPT-6 Sol or GPT OSS 20B?

GPT-6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 49.4 to 17.9. GPT-6 Sol is made by OpenAI and GPT OSS 20B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Sol compare to GPT OSS 20B in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Sol scores DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, OSWorld 2.0: 64.4%, Agents' Last Exam: 56.4%, FrontierCode 1.1: 49.3%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 33.2%. GPT OSS 20B scores MMLU: 85.3%, CodeForces: 74.3%, GPQA: 71.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 54.8%, HealthBench: 42.5%.

Is GPT-6 Sol cheaper than GPT OSS 20B?

GPT OSS 20B is 66.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. GPT OSS 20B costs $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Sol and GPT OSS 20B?

GPT-6 Sol supports 1.1M tokens and GPT OSS 20B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Sol and GPT OSS 20B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.4 vs 17.9), context window (1.1M vs 131K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.03/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.