The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash

GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched at 48.7 and 51.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.7 and 51.1.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Sol

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.7
#26
51.1
#14
Reasoning
45.3
#34
47.7
#25
Coding
35.3
#29
39.2
#17
Agents
35.8
#19
38.3
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-6 Sol
Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool use
25.6#32
29.0#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for GPT-6 Sol · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Sol specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Sol specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Sol supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

GPT-6 Sol can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Sol was released on 2026-09-22, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than GPT-6 Sol.

GPT-6 Sol

Sep 22, 2026

2 weeks ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-20, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Sol's training data extends to 2026-04-20, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Sol

Apr 2026

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Sol
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-6 Sol or Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.7 and 51.1. GPT-6 Sol is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Sol compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Sol scores DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, OSWorld 2.0: 64.4%, Agents' Last Exam: 56.4%, FrontierCode 1.1: 49.3%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 33.2%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-6 Sol supports 1.1M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.7 vs 51.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-6 Sol is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons