The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Sol vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

GPT-6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 49.0 to 27.8. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 8.9x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Sol leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.0 to 27.8, ranking #24 overall.

On price, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is roughly 8.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Sol also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Sol

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.0 and ranks #24 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 8.9x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
49.0
#24
27.8
#146
44.9
#33
27.5
#142
35.5
#28
18.8
#117
36.4
#17
10.6
#121
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,050,000
256,000

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for GPT-6 Sol · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Sol and MAI-Code-1.1-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Sol ($2.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Sol ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Sol is more expensive than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Sol accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Only GPT-6 Sol specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Sol and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Sol was released on 2026-09-22, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.

GPT-6 Sol is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

GPT-6 Sol

Sep 22, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-20, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Sol's training data extends to 2026-04-20, but cannot make a direct comparison without MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-6 Sol

Apr 2026

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

—

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Sol is available from OpenAI. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is available from GitHub Copilot.

GPT-6 Sol

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

github-copilot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Sol and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Sol
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Sol vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Which is better, GPT-6 Sol or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 49.0 to 27.8. GPT-6 Sol is made by OpenAI and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Sol compare to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Sol scores DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, OSWorld 2.0: 64.4%, Agents' Last Exam: 56.4%, FrontierCode 1.1: 49.3%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 33.2%. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%.

Is GPT-6 Sol cheaper than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via openai. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output via github-copilot.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Sol and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Sol supports 1.1M tokens and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Sol and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.0 vs 27.8), context window (1.1M vs 256K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.20/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Sol and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Sol is developed by OpenAI and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.