The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6.1 Sol vs MedGemma 4B IT

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 53.6 to -4.8.

OpenAI · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the overall LLM Stats Score 53.6 to -4.8, ranking #7 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol

  • overall performance matters — it scores 53.6 and ranks #7 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MedGemma 4B IT

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
MedGemma 4B IT
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
53.6
#7
-4.8
#374
Reasoning
51.6
#8
-5.2
#370
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
GPT-6.1 Sol
MedGemma 4B IT
Vision
35.8#11
-6.8#224
Multimodal
35.5#11
-5.5#183
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for GPT-6.1 Sol · 7 for MedGemma 4B IT

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6.1 Sol and MedGemma 4B ITdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6.1 Sol specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6.1 Sol specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6.1 Sol and MedGemma 4B IT support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6.1 Sol is licensed under a proprietary license, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6.1 Sol was released on 2026-09-29, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

GPT-6.1 Sol is 17 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Sep 29, 2026

3 weeks ago

1.4yr newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6.1 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-30, while MedGemma 4B IT's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6.1 Sol's training data extends to 2026-04-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without MedGemma 4B IT's cutoff date.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Apr 2026

MedGemma 4B IT

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6.1 Sol and MedGemma 4B IT side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6.1 Sol
✓ Preferred
MedGemma 4B IT
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6.1 Sol vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Sol or MedGemma 4B IT?

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 53.6 to -4.8. GPT-6.1 Sol is made by OpenAI and MedGemma 4B IT is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6.1 Sol compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2): 100.0%, HealthBench Consensus: 96.0%, MMMU-Pro: 86.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, SimpleQA Verified: 73.9%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6.1 Sol and MedGemma 4B IT?

GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1.1M tokens and MedGemma 4B IT supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6.1 Sol and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (53.6 vs -4.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6.1 Sol and MedGemma 4B IT?

GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI and MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google.

Related comparisons