The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6.1 Terra vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

GPT-6.1 Terra leads the LLM Stats Score 47.5 to -6.1.

OpenAI · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6.1 Terra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.5 to -6.1, ranking #36 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6.1 Terra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.5 and ranks #36 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.5
#36
-6.1
#395
Reasoning
49.0
#19
-6.1
#387
Coding
37.1
#30
2.8
#254
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for GPT-6.1 Terra · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6.1 Terra and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6.1 Terra specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6.1 Terra specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Terra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6.1 Terra supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

GPT-6.1 Terra can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6.1 Terra is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6.1 Terra was released on 2026-10-26, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

GPT-6.1 Terra is 18 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Oct 26, 2026

4 days ago

1.5yr newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6.1 Terra has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6.1 Terra's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Jun 2026

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6.1 Terra and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6.1 Terra
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6.1 Terra vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Terra or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

GPT-6.1 Terra leads the LLM Stats Score 47.5 to -6.1. GPT-6.1 Terra is made by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6.1 Terra compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

GPT-6.1 Terra scores HealthBench Consensus: 95.1%, HealthBench Professional: 62.7%, Agents' Last Exam: 60.0%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 58.3%, MentalHealthBench: 55.5%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6.1 Terra and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

GPT-6.1 Terra supports 1.1M tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6.1 Terra and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.5 vs -6.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6.1 Terra and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

GPT-6.1 Terra is developed by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons