The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-Live-1 vs LFM3-1.7B

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

OpenAI · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-Live-1 and LFM3-1.7B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-Live-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-Live-1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose LFM3-1.7B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-Live-1
OpenAI
LFM3-1.7B
Liquid AI
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

2 reported for GPT-Live-1 · 20 for LFM3-1.7B

1 shared

GPT-Live-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (TAU3-Bench), while LFM3-1.7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-Live-1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas LFM3-1.7B does not.

GPT-Live-1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-Live-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM3-1.7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-Live-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while LFM3-1.7B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-Live-1

Proprietary

Closed source

LFM3-1.7B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-Live-1 was released on 2026-09-10, while LFM3-1.7B was released on 2026-10-27.

LFM3-1.7B is 2 months newer than GPT-Live-1.

GPT-Live-1

Sep 10, 2026

1 months ago

LFM3-1.7B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-Live-1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-07-31, while LFM3-1.7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-Live-1's training data extends to 2025-07-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM3-1.7B's cutoff date.

GPT-Live-1

Jul 2025

LFM3-1.7B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-Live-1 and LFM3-1.7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-Live-1
✓ Preferred
LFM3-1.7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-Live-1 vs LFM3-1.7B.

Which is better, GPT-Live-1 or LFM3-1.7B?

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-Live-1 is made by OpenAI and LFM3-1.7B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-Live-1 compare to LFM3-1.7B in benchmarks?

GPT-Live-1 scores TAU3-Bench: 86.2%, Tau3 Banking: 32.0%. LFM3-1.7B scores IFEval: 96.7%, Multi-IF: 89.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 73.5%, IFBench: 73.0%, BFCL-V4: 71.4%.

What are the main differences between GPT-Live-1 and LFM3-1.7B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-Live-1 and LFM3-1.7B?

GPT-Live-1 is developed by OpenAI and LFM3-1.7B is developed by Liquid AI.

Related comparisons